Home Blog Hong Kong to Disclose All Crypto License Applicants After JPEX Probe

Hong Kong to Disclose All Crypto License Applicants After JPEX Probe

Hong Kong to Disclose All Crypto License Applicants After JPEX Probe

In the aftermath of a thorough investigation into the activities of JPEX, a prominent cryptocurrency exchange, Hong Kong’s financial regulators are taking a significant step towards enhancing transparency in the crypto industry. This landmark decision mandates the public disclosure of all entities seeking cryptocurrency licenses, marking a pivotal moment in the region’s cryptocurrency regulatory landscape.

JPEX probe

The JPEX probe, which uncovered allegations of fraud and a lack of transparency within the cryptocurrency exchange, sent shockwaves through the industry and triggered calls for more stringent oversight. Responding to these concerns, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) jointly unveiled this groundbreaking policy to ensure that the public and investors have access to critical information about cryptocurrency license applicants.


Under the revised framework, applicants seeking licenses to operate cryptocurrency exchanges or related businesses in Hong Kong will undergo a comprehensive vetting process. This assessment will encompass evaluating their financial stability, compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations, and their commitment to robust cybersecurity measures. Once an application is submitted, the applicant’s details, including the company’s name and key personnel, will be made publicly available. This transparency empowers investors and the general public to make well-informed decisions when engaging with specific cryptocurrency platforms.

The move towards increased openness is generally welcomed within the cryptocurrency industry, as it has the potential to reduce the likelihood of fraudulent activities and improve overall market confidence. Moreover, it aligns Hong Kong’s cryptocurrency regulations with international standards, reflecting a global trend towards legitimizing and regulating the cryptocurrency sector.

However, concerns have been raised regarding the balance between transparency and individual privacy, as well as the competitiveness of licensed entities. Critics argue that full disclosure may dissuade legitimate businesses from applying for licenses due to concerns about sensitive information being exploited by competitors or malicious actors.

To address these concerns, the HKMA and SFC have assured applicants that their proprietary financial information will remain confidential. Only essential information related to the applicant’s identity and background will be disclosed to the public, striking a balance between transparency and safeguarding privacy.


In conclusion, Hong Kong’s decision to publicly disclose all cryptocurrency license applicants signifies a pivotal moment in the regulation of the cryptocurrency industry in the region. It reflects a commitment to transparency, investor protection, and market integrity while acknowledging the need to address legitimate privacy and competitiveness concerns. The successful implementation of this policy will depend on ongoing collaboration between regulators and industry participants, shaping the future of cryptocurrency in Hong Kong.